The Bakken, a little about EUR and R/P
In this post I present some of the methods I have used to get estimates based on actual NDIC data on the Estimated Ultimate Recovery (EUR) for wells in the Bakken North Dakota.
The Bakken is here being treated as one big entity. As the Bakken shales [for geological reasons] are not ubiquitous there will be differences amongst pools, formations and companies.
One metric to evaluate the efficiency of a Light Tight Oil (LTO) well and a large population of wells are looking at developments in the Reserves over Production (R/P) ratio.
The R/P ratio is a snapshot that gives a theoretical duration, normally expressed in years, the production level for one particular year can be sustained at with the reserves in production at the end of that year.
Further, as LTO wells decline steeply and a big portion of the total extraction has come/comes from wells started less than 2 years ago, this dominates the Reserves/Production (R/P) ratio. The flow from a big population of high flowing wells in steep decline results in a low R/P ratio (and vice versa).
The R/P metric says nothing about extraction in absolute terms, which is another metric that needs to be brought into consideration in order to obtain a more complete picture of expected developments.
Development in Well Totals by CategoriesThe average Bakken well is now estimated to reach a EUR of 320 kbo [kbo; kilo barrels oil = 1,000 bo]. Based on this, the average well has an R/P of 2.7 after its first year of flow, which suggests that about 27% of its EUR is recovered during its first year of flow.
Estimates done by others based on actual NDIC data puts now the EUR for the average Bakken well slightly below 300 kbo.
As from what point the wells reach the end of their economic life, educated guesses now spans from 10 bo/d (0.3 kbo/Month) to 25 bo/d (0.75 kbo/Month).
Formatted NDIC data kindly made available by Enno Peters, who operates the site shaleprofile.com which has a great number of charts based on actual data sorted on wells by shale plays, companies and much more to be explored.
Simplistic explained the chart illustrates that the rapid growth in producing wells, until the oil price collapsed, did little to increase the R/P ratio. The debt fueled increase in wells did for some time grow production, but due to the steep decline rates of LTO wells it did little to how long the obtained level could be sustained.
If no wells were added post Jun-16, this would materialize itself by a continued decline in the extraction while the R/P ratio slowly grew, likely towards 8-9, before it declines.
Simplistic explained an LTO well drains a theoretical horizontal cylinder with the production string in its center.
One of the main objectives in the design of LTO wells is to recover the oil within this “cylinder” as fast as possible while practicing good reservoir management. The companies want to recover their investment as fast as possible (reach payout) and start making a profit.
Drilling, completing and starting wells allow the companies to book reserves both as Proven Developed Producing (PDP) and Proven UnDeveloped (PUD). The more wells that are drilled and started the more reserves can be booked.
Reserves are one of the important parameters that are used for assets/equity estimates and for PV10 (standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows) by the companies and THE major physical property that is used as collateral for assuming debt.
Studying the SEC 10-K filings for several public companies which major oil production (more than 90%) comes from the Bakken, it was found that their R/P ratios at end 2015 was in the range of 6 – 10.
The SEC estimates of reserves apply some risk adjustments which make these conservative with the objective to shield investors and creditors.
It is worth noticing the difference in the R/P ratio of about 4 for the Bakken derived from applying actual data to that of 6-10 derived from companies SEC 10-K filings.
Compare this to an R/P ratio of about 7 for all conventional reservoirs [which has slower declines] that were flowing at end 2015 on the Norwegian Continental Shelf (NCS) based upon data from the Norwegian Petroleum Directorate (NPD).
Refer also to the text in figure 2 in this post for more about the assumptions used for the estimates presented in figure 3 above.
Allowing for some margin (due to exclusion of hedges, natural gas and NGLs to name some) the Bakken in recent months has for all practical reasons been cash flow neutral.
The operators are now netting back a total of around $400 M/Month (with WTI at $47/bo), or in the neighborhood of $5 B/a.
The estimates do not include income from sales of natural gas and NGLs (Natural Gas Liquids) which during the last 2 years has come at a loss of $2-$3/Mcf. [1 bo LTO comes now with about 1.6 Mcf.]
Just to retire estimated total debts (about $36 Billion, including costs for DUCs, SDWs, excluding hedges and income/loss of natural gas and NGLs) would require about 7 years with extraction and prices at Jun-16 levels.
Estimated remaining reserves support [theoretically; ref the R/P ratio in figure 2] about 4 years at present extraction levels, thus the (average) oil price need to become higher to allow for an orderly retirement of the total debts.
The estimates below make a cut off at 2040 and are for the wells started as from Jan-08 and per Jun-16.
Nominally to retire all debts (reach payout) would take an (average) future oil price close to $65/bo (WTI) for all the wells in operation as of end June – 16. This is without making any profit.
In the range of $85-90/bo (WTI) the Bakken (looking at it as one entity) would return about 7%.
The steep decline and a sustained low oil price ($45/bo) sets up a vicious dynamic which I will illustrate by using Jun-16 as a baseline.
For the wells in production as per Jun-16, the total extraction of these will decline about 40% by Jun-17, and depletes their remaining reserves with about 20%. By assuming the operations remain cash flow neutral, total debt remains at $36 B in Jun-17.
As from Jul-17 this would now require an average oil price of about $73/bo (WTI) for these wells to nominally retire all debts (reach payout). Additional wells will add to what price is required to retire the total debt.
To now reach a return of 7% takes an average future oil price of $110/bo (WTI).
This illustrates why a lasting, low oil price makes it harder to service and retire the debts assumed for LTO extraction.
The collapse in the oil price has made several companies address their debt problems [strengthen their balance sheets] through prepackaged Chapter 11 filings and equity/asset sales.
The Top 10 Wells by first 12 Months Totals in the Bakken (ND)
What follows is a closer look at the top 10 wells in the Bakken as of June-16. The wells were selected based on their first 12 months totals. These wells represent 0.1% of the wells in operation.
The chart above gives some idea about how the extraction rate for LTO wells slows over time and provides some guidance about the trajectories of the EUR for the wells. The most recent well, Riverview 102-32H, is after 13 months by totals number 10.
Note the rapid increase in the GOR (Gas Oil Ratio) since Feb-16, from about 3 to 4 while the LTO rate declined about 50%.